Skimming through the lists of new articles in my RSS reader today, my eyes stopped at one paper in particular. The title, “Genesis of Creativity“, would not have seemed out of place in a psychology text (indeed, there are whole journals devoted to creativity research), but this journal was ACS Nano. I clicked through, thinking that the article was perhaps about the discovery of creativity-inducing nanowires.

In fact, the article was something much less far-fetched but still quite interesting. It was a perspective by James Tour, a chemist at Rice University and recipient of the 2012 ACS Nano Lectureship Award. On the occasion of this honor, Tour felt compelled to think back on the greatest successes from his research career and trace them back to their sources. He starts by recognizing the students and postdocs who did the labwork, of course, but he doesn’t stop there. He profiles three exceptionally creative problem solvers from his lab and asks the question: If the greatest discoveries in nanoscience have come from these brilliant minds, where did the brilliant minds come from?

It is an American tragedy whenever an unarmed teenage boy–of any color–is fatally shot. And when you strip down the Trayvon Martin shooting to its core, that is exactly what we were all faced with in Florida several weeks ago–a senseless tragedy. As a result, there has been a re-emergence of questions about the meaning of race in today’s America. I will be taking on some of these tough questions in a series of blog posts I’m calling “An Inconvenient Truth.” In this discussion of race in America, I will pull no punches.

One of the main talking points (but definitely not the only one) in the Trayvon Martin shooting, and in the eventual arrest of his killer, George Zimmerman, has been race. Did race play a role in Zimmerman’s actions that day? Was Zimmerman unfairly judging Martin based on his skin color?  If Martin was of another racial/ethnic group, would the same things have happened? 

“Tony” did everything he could to get the pretty red-eyed girl.  He chased her into the corner, tapped her abdomen with his forelegs, serenaded her with his single-winged song, and even licked her genitalia. Despite a perfect performance of this hard-wired mating dance, he was rejected.

Like any good cowboy in a sad country song, Tony turned to the bottle. But unlike most cowboys, Tony is a fly.

New research shows that humans aren’t the only species to turn to alcohol after social or sexual rejection. The paper Sexual Deprivation Increases Ethanol Intake in Drosophila, published last month in Nature, explores the influence of reward pathways on sex, drugs and social interactions — and gives a whole new meaning to the term “barfly.”

The brain’s reward system is designed to reinforce behaviors necessary for survival. Both natural “highs” and highs that result from drug intake can trigger this reward system.  Abnormal regions within reward pathways are often associated with addiction.